A Human Performance article brought to you by our Main Partners

By John Portch

• Psychological safety is the biggest difference between the top and lowest performing teams

• It requires intentional work on the part of leaders

• Is it ‘failure’ or simply a problem to solve?

Quick recap: what is psychological safety?

Amy Edmondson, an organisational behavioural scientist, coined the term ‘team psychological safety’. She defined it as: “a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk taking.” When Google announced the results of its Project Aristotle, which sought to understand the characteristics of effective teams. Psychological safety was identified as the biggest factor. The others were ‘dependability’, ‘clarity,’ ‘impact’ and ‘meaning’. But psychological safety stood out.

“This is a little bit of a clinical-sounding term but this is the best one we have to describe this sense of ability to take interpersonal risks in a work setting,” said Abeer Dubey, Google’s Director of People Analytics, who led Project Aristotle. Dubey was speaking to an audience of Leaders Performance Institute members at 2021’s Virtual Leaders Meet: Total High Performance.

He continued: “We have all been in a situation where somebody senior in an organisation or the hierarchy suggested something and we may or may not agree with that; or some acronym has been thrown out there in a team meeting. Are we in a culture where we feel comfortable raising our hands either in terms of pushing back on a decision made by a senior leader or asking a question that may seem like a stupid question in the context of the meeting?

What does that look like in practice?

Dubey painted a picture of psychological safety at Google. “Teams that were good at doing this had that safe environment where people took small interpersonal risks on a day to day basis,” he said. “They will jump or chime in. This wasn’t just something about feeling good. We could actually see a direct impact on our revenue performance, especially in our sales team.” Teams that feel safe are more effective. “Through this comes this process of learning quickly and this translates into a direct impact,” he added.

How can you help your teams to get better?

Google instigated its gTeams programme, which was designed to help the organisation improve across the key characteristics identified in effective teams by Project Aristotle. Of gTeams, Dubey said: “It’s very difficult to even bring up a topic like psychological safety unless you have a term for it. If there’s no formal construct for that then these things can easily go unnoticed, so I think an explicit practice of going through this type of review is something that can help thousands of companies.”

From failure to problem solving

For astute leaders, there is the potential for failures to become problem-solving exercises for teams to coalesce around. Dubey cites the ‘pre-mortems’ carried out by the Google X innovation lab under its CEO Astro Teller. “He got the senior members of his team and he said ‘OK, imagine if we had actually failed in a project,’” said Dubey. “If you think about today and what’s working, people always get in defensive mode. He said: ‘OK, think about it yourself. If we had failed, what could we have done better?’ And it completely changed the dynamic where the thing that could have been defensive became like a problem-solving exercise and everyone came together. He calls this exercise a ‘pre-mortem’, which is where you imagine that you have already failed and this is what we could have done about it. That’s the kind of thing we ask people to think about. Small things in a day to day setting that can have a huge impact.”

Is there truly room for psychological safety in sport?

In 2021, we published a Special Report that reflected on psychological safety’s journey towards being acknowledged as a competitive edge in sport and, in bringing those pages to life, we spoke to Leaders Performance Advisor, David Fletcher, the Senior Lecturer in Performance Psychology and Management at Loughborough University.

These are an excerpt of his reflections at the time:

“What I think will be very interesting looking at the next five years, is the whole wellbeing and welfare movement in elite sport because that’s definitely gaining momentum and traction, with good reason. How do we sit that alongside the demands for high performance and wanting to win? That’s not going to go away either. The best athletes and the best coaches are going to have a real need to win.

“We’ve seen in the past, whether it be Lance Armstrong or Michael Jordan, this burning desire to succeed at all costs, spills over. There’s a real recognition in elite sport that that does happen and has happened.

“The question now is how can we manage that will to win at all costs? I’m not sure you can do that in people who really want to win; like the people who are training for an Olympic gold medal. They’re totally single-minded. It’s not necessarily about taking the edge off that, it’s about juggling that to a point where it’s not winning at all costs – it’s winning hopefully without other costs.

“That’s where I hope psychological safety will play a role within that, where it becomes a more sophisticated culture and climate where we can strive to excel, we can strive to win, but not at the cost of cheating, bullying, abuse, fear of failure.

“It’s very easy for me to say it but it’s a lot harder in the cutthroat nature of elite sport. When you start losing people’s jobs and positions are on the line; that’s when this really gets put to the test.”

By Sarah Evans

• Champions cannot stand still

• Understand your opponents

• Prepare for the future

Set targets, and redefine them

It is widely known that setting targets is key in order to achieve, however, Toto Wolff, Team Principal and CEO of Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One team, stressed the importance of redefining these targets in order to ensure longevity of success, when we spoke with him back in 2016. Mercedes had just won back to back F1 drivers’ and constructors’ world championships. They have since gone on to claim a further five drivers’ and six constructors’ titles. Wolff explained that at the start of each season, all of the senior staff members take 48 hours offsite together to redefine their objectives. He said: “we look at our values, our mission and our visions, we look at the functionality of the organisation and we come out with a list of objectives for the coming season, both personal and team objectives.” Wolff highlighted that underpinning this was the necessity to manage their talent and reinvent the organisation without destroying what they already have today. “What we try to achieve now is to maintain our status as the team to beat,” he continued.

Use your opponents as motivation

Wolff instils a philosophy amongst the senior leaders and filters it through the organization, that they must focus on their counter parts in opposing teams and ensure they are out performing them. “Each of us has an opposite number at Ferrari or Red Bull and if each of us does a better job than our opposite number then the collective result is going to be better,” said Wolff. He provided an anecdote about how one of his senior managers has taken this philosophy one step further. “One of our senior managers has a picture of his opposite number from a rival team stuck to the wall next to his desk. Every time he looks up from his desk he faces a big A4 printout… and he knows exactly who he needs to beat and already has the strategy to get there because the target is set.”

The moment you become comfortable, its time to move on

Wolff is focused on succession planning for the next generation of senior management and is constantly looking ahead. He asks: “How do you see the next generation of leaders after yourself? You have great coaches and leaders in the team now but what happens in five years?” Wolff believes that teams should build capability beyond their leaders, because the goal is for the team to continue to succeed once they’ve moved on. “Your legacy should be a structure that rolls. The wheel turns because you have built that capability,” he stated. Good senior leaders understand their time will come to move on to another position. It is something that’s very difficult especially if you’ve got a good role, you are well paid and you are having success. Wolff added: “you want to hold onto it, you want to stay there in that comfortable place. But the moment it becomes a comfortable place, it’s time for someone else to take over.”

Maintaining a ‘disruptive edge’

Here, Leaders Performance Advisor Edd Vahid, the Assistant Academy Director at Premier League club Southampton, shares his thoughts on Wolff’s approach at Mercedes:

The approach Toto Wolff describes in the article reminds me of the insights Radically Traditional disclosed following their research into organisations who have enjoyed sustained success. Specifically, the seven organisations (including the All Blacks and NASA) were distinguished by the headline features of a stable core and disruptive edge. The commitment to regular reviews appears to provide Toto and his team the opportunity to celebrate and maintain their unique features (i.e., a stable core) whilst inviting opportunities for innovation (i.e., a disruptive edge).

Protecting time in a fast-paced and dynamic environment to conduct reviews and develop succession plans is vital. In my experience, a comprehensive review can often generate new and exciting work streams that help extend an individual’s comfort zone, whilst simultaneously strengthening staff succession plans.

By Sarah Evans

• Understand your core values and stick to them

• Clarity and alignment from everyone is key

• Improvement requires change, and change requires action

A mixture of continuity and adaptation is key for sustained success

Sir Dave Brailsford, Team Principal of the INEOS Grenadiers (formerly Team Sky and Team INEOS), shared with our audience at the 2017 Leaders Sport Performance Summit in London, how Team Sky first operated and how they became one of the most dominant teams in world cycling. “You can’t be a selection of people doing something in isolation, you have to have certain values and continuity to have sustained success over years and years,” said Brailsford. Right at the inception of Team Sky, the staff sat together and asked ‘what do we want to be about?’ and they realised that in order to succeed they needed to be able to adapt to the ever changing environment but also needed a few anchors and values to stick to through thick and thin. Team Sky, Brailsford added, had a line as a symbol for the team, and it signified continuity, but as he explained, “you’re never dealing with the same problem, it changes all the time and you have to recognise that and adapt.”

Success lies in planning

Everyone in sport, and life, knows that planning is a crucial part of success, with the old saying, ‘fail to prepare, prepare to fail’. However, Brailsford highlights that it isn’t the plan itself that is critical, it’s the planning process, and that “it is the discussions that are crucial.” He expects every one of his staff to have a professional opinion, as he always looks to work from the consensus, and only when this isn’t possible, will he arbitrate. It is important they always understand why, the power is in those discussions, and the team have all been involved in the creation of the plan. This planning is for the overall strategy, but also goes into the minute detail for every rider. “The more you have clarity and alignment, it isn’t that hard to deliver the performance, it’s when there isn’t clarity and alignment and you take a one-size-fits-all approach to every rider, it fails,” stated Brailsford.

Improvement requires change

It is one thing being successful, but a much harder task to be able to sustain that over many years. “If you do the same thing you’re going to go backwards,” explained Brailsford, “all of your competition will be looking to beat you and to improve, so you can’t just do what you did to be successful the first time round, you have to adapt and continually improve. Brailsford stated that the “difference between good and great is someone who does something.” Change requires action, and the people who win and make a difference are the people who do. “The people in Team Sky can be bothered to do the things that maybe people in other teams can’t be bothered to do, and that makes the difference,” said Brailsford. “Improvement requires change, but the problem is not all change equals improvement.” It can be very tempting to change things for change’s sake, so you have to be deliberate about it. You have to understand what interventions are going to give you the greatest reward and do a couple each season. “Being excellent at the simple things is the key to winning,” highlighted Brailsford. If you start to do too much with things which occur on the periphery, you miss the basics, which will be a disaster. You need small scale actionable improvements over time – the ‘marginal gains’ which Brailsford has become so well known for. Finally, he added: “It is all about action, talk about it and do it. It might not work, but at least you know. We don’t wait, we’re first.”

Fuelling the incessant demand for the new

The Leaders Performance Institute reviewed the session in tandem with Leaders Performance Advisor David Fletcher, the Senior Lecturer in Performance Psychology at Loughborough University, who shared his views on the topic of sustained success.

David, do Dave Brailsford’s words still ring true?

A universal truth apparent throughout Dave’s comments is that sport at the highest level is characterised by fierce competition and winning by small margins. Underpinning success in elite sport is the ability to continually raise performance to higher levels. In essence, those who are able to enhance performance sooner, to a greater extent, and/or on a more sustainable basis than the opposition are victorious. This results in goals and standards moving onwards and upwards, which in turn fuels an incessant demand to find new means and methods to stay ahead of the performance curve. It is clear that, as a leader in elite sport, Dave is – and has to be – very focused on what it takes to attain and sustain the highest levels of performance in elite cycling.

How do you feel this space is evolving in sport?

There are two things that I think are particularly fascinating about the innovation required to stay ahead of the performance curve in elite sport. The first is how best to harmonise the latest advances in sports science and medicine together with the art of high-performance coaching whilst remaining sensitive to the uniqueness of every training and competition context. I believe that the best leaders and teams are those who are able to work together to capitalise on each other’s strengthens whilst developing areas for improvement, regardless of whether they are the ‘simple basics’, ‘marginal gains’, or more sophisticated technologically-based advances – it all counts toward staying at the top. The second area relates to the increasing awareness that winning should not come at all costs. Following concerns about the price that some athletes are willing to pay in their pursuit of excellence and about the lengths that some coaches will go to drive their teams toward victory, there is a recognition and desire to find more ethical ways of attaining and sustaining high performance whilst maintaining and enhancing wellbeing. As a consequence, striving for high performance and holistic health has rightly become the focus of most modern day leaders and coaches in elite sport.

By Sarah Evans

• Wellbeing and resilience sit front and centre

• Communicate with care

• Plan, do, review

1. Be sure to understand and value the individual

There is a growing awareness across all sports that wellbeing and resilience play a key role in the achievement and sustainment of success. Dan Lewindon, Head of Performance Science and Medicine at the Lawn Tennis Association [LTA], explained in our Virtual Leaders Meet in 2020, that in fact, wellbeing and resilience “sit front and centre in our discussions about our athletes and in our conversations with them.” It is critical to understand the individual as a whole, their abilities, their drivers, and take the time to understand their individual backgrounds and experiences that make them who they are. Lewindon also highlighted that individually tailoring the approach to each athlete is crucial and “our understanding of their context is key in building a relationship of trust and ultimately influence.”

2. Shape your environment and communication

There has been an explosion in specialism within sports science which has created the opportunity for dedicated expertise and diverse thinking in how you solve problems. However, Lewindon warned that this could lead to silo thinking and unnecessary noise. He explained how it is critical to filter these into a system that is clear and cohesive, with an integrated approach in a “structured and safe environment where stake holders and support staff can share their views and feel valued for doing so.” If this is done right it creates real clarity for the athlete, and reduces unnecessary noise and distraction. Lewindon also highlighted how imperative it is to communicate with care: “don’t use overly technical or medical language with the athletes, do what is best for them, not for you”. The trust that staff members create, the genuine connection they have with the athletes, and communication they use, can have a huge impact on the performance outcome.

3. Have a clear plan and processes

Lewindon stated how important it is to understand how to support the athlete, and how to shape the training environment and programme, in order to go after the priorities needed for performance. You must make it crystal clear to the athlete how everything aligns, be that testing, monitoring or training techniques. “It is important the athletes and coaches understand the ‘why’ and the ‘how’ this is going to impact their performance,” said Lewindon. This understanding then provides the confidence and clarity needed in order to push forwards. “The individual development plans that are successful are those which are genuinely owned by the athlete” he added. The athletes are part of the conversation, process and it is written in their language. Finally, the review process is critical, it is not something that you just make once and then never look at again. “Plan, do, review, regularly,” said Lewindon. It takes real time and effort to do, but it is crucial to take time to both look back and to plan ahead.

By Sarah Evans

• Pushing the players hard every day is not sustainable

• Open, honest and respectful conversations are crucial for successful culture

• Player empowerment is important but the coach must take ultimate responsibility

High performance environments are all about balance

Clubs and people are often judged heavily on whether they win or lose, and of course winning is every team’s goal, but the context for each team, and opportunities they might have are so different, explained Chris Scott, Senior Coach of the Geelong Cats in the Australian Football League, at our Sport Performance Summit in Charlotte back in 2020. “We focus in too much on standards, it’s important, but only one part of the high performance environment” stated Scott when delving deeper into what makes a successful team environment. He emphasised that if you only look to drive standards in training, then you miss out on some other crucial aspects which make up a winning team such as psychological safety, wellbeing and most importantly enjoying playing the sport. “You need to be really clear on when to push, but it needs to be balanced off with the work outside of those hard periods,” he added. If the players are dreading turning up to training every day, you’re not going to get the best out of them, and pushing them hard constantly, is an unsustainable model.

When to prioritise the future over short-term success

One of Scott’s biggest strengths is his ability to collaborate with a large group of staff and players. This skill is crucial when dealing with a wide range of players, with many being only 17 years old, to those in their mid-30s approaching the end of their careers. Being able to provide messaging and alignment for that broad spectrum of players is a key attribute for a successful coach. One of Scott’s first priorities was to “embrace change, and transition young players into the team.” However, when bringing in youth, you need to have older players move on, and managing those transitions can be very challenging. Scott emphasised that it is crucial to articulate that plan to the wider squad and make it very clear to the older players “they weren’t just going to be thrown on the scrap heap.” It is so important to give the older players the respect they deserve and manage the transition effectively, so the team can be successful both in the short and long term. How this transition is managed also has a huge effect on the mid-range players, and their perception of how they will be treated when they come towards the end of their careers. So having these conversations in a really open, honest and respectful way is key.

When to empower the players and when to use your expertise as a coach

Player empowerment as a concept has grown more and more popular as a coaching method, and numerous teams see great success when it is adopted. However, Scott explains that how and when you empower your players can be crucial, and also how the context of your own environments play a big role in this. “Fundamentally I work for the players as a coach, so what they believe is best for their performance is of paramount importance,” said Scott. But, he caveated this with saying that ultimately the coach needs to take the final responsibility and had to set the overall principles by which the team is aligned. It also depends on the make up of the team. If you have a squad who are very individual and you give too much responsibility to the whole squad, the result will be people pulling in different directions and no cohesion. Scott explained that the most effective way to marry player empowerment with cohesion was to “make sure the views of the most influential players are congruent to the ways the senior leadership want to lead the club”. Finally, understanding when to empower the players and ask for their feedback and when to take the lead and use your own expertise as a coach is critical to success.

By John Portch

The Leicester Tigers’ turnaround under Head Coach Steve Borthwick has been remarkable.

The team claimed a record ninth Gallagher Premiership title, defeating Saracens 15-12 at Twickenham Stadium in last weekend’s final, just two seasons after finishing eleventh.

Borthwick, who took the Tigers’ reins in 2020, led them to sixth in his first campaign and is a champion at the end of his second. It is an outcome he would have dreamed of when he spoke at Virtual Leaders Meet: Coach Development in April 2020, just weeks after confirming his new post.

“This is a great club that has lost its way and this is a fantastic challenge – and I love a challenge,” he told an audience of Leaders Performance Institute members drawn from across the globe. “I need to go in with a real, clear plan, what are we going to do? How are we going to go about it? But I’m also really clear that whilst I have my ideas – I’m going to give a clear direction of what we’re going to try and do, then you’re going to harness the skills of every one of the coaches, every one of the players – to make sure we find the best way of doing it.”

Those sentiments ring true two summers later. Borthwick’s humility has been a mainstay at Leicester and was evident during his appearance on the virtual Leaders stage, where he spoke of developing his craft as a coach, as well as creating experiential environments to support the development of his players through feedback and communication.

Here, we outline some of his reflections from that session supplemented by some insights from Leaders Performance Advisor Edd Vahid, who serves as Assistant Academy Director at English Premier League club Southampton FC.

Find ways to challenge and support players

“The title of this session is ‘mastering the craft’ but I’m a million miles away from that.” Borthwick, who retired from playing in 2014 while already working as an assistant coach to Eddie Jones with the Japan men’s national team, learnt quickly that simply coaching from his experience as a player would leave him redundant. He said: “My coaching developed into one of trying to always understand the game; and the best coaches are the best players. I want to learn from them, observe them, see how they go about things; posing challenges to them and then observing how they deal with those challenges. How can I make some suggestions that help? How can I get players to learn from other players and what other coaches are around that I can learn from? The more you coach, the more you learn, the more you realise what you don’t know.”

Devise game-relevant practice sessions

A practice session has limited value if you haven’t made clear the principle that you’re working on or the context in which you’re trying to do it. “With England, in practice, we work off a checklist of things that ensure the context is clear,” said Borthwick, who coached England’s men’s forwards under Eddie Jones between 2015 and 2020. “Am I making that clear to the players? Am I putting them in situations that are game-relevant and am I asking them to adapt to situations that develop their skill and enables them to coach each other? Be very clear about the endpoint that you’re working towards.”

Be more interested in what you don’t know

A coach must be able to spot the gaps in their knowledge and skillsets and work to bridge those gaps. “I think there’s a big gap in my coaching background around teaching. When you’re a teacher trying to engage people who don’t want to be engaged, by comparison, I’ve got it easy, working with elite rugby players; I see that gap and I’m trying to educate myself,” said Borthwick.

How do you get the best out of your players in any given moment?

“How do you get a message to a player and get the best out of them? Everyone is different,” said Borthwick. “There is a time and place for absolutely everything; the skill of the coach is knowing when you recognise the right approach at any point in time. You’ve got to be absolutely clear what standards are expected, what your key objective is within any one session, and then understanding how you get the best out of each of the players.”

The power of self-reflection

Self-reflection is key. “How do you reflect at the end of each day or each session? Do you write it down? Do you have it on your computer? Do you have a journal or a diary?” asked Borthwick. “We all make mistakes but it’s how do we learn from them? You’ve got to continue to learn, understand the context of the day, that period in the season, that player and their life, and get the best out of them.”

The view from Leaders Performance Advisor Edd Vahid:

Steve offers a number of clues as to why he and his Leicester Tigers team have enjoyed their recent successes. He appears invested in developing strong processes that apply to both his personal development and the team’s progression. The term ‘clear’ features multiple times in the transcript and is perhaps evidence of a desire to provide coaching and playing staff with the clarity required to perform. Providing a clear direction and detailed expectations, whilst at the same time embracing uncertainty and responding to individual needs, requires significant skill.

The humility and curiosity that underpins a commitment to personal development is also evident. Phil Jackson famously championed the value of a ‘beginner’s mind’ and this appears evident in Steve’s approach. Jackson reportedly said ‘in the beginner’s mind there are many possibilities; in the expert’s mind there are few’. We often talk about learning representing a competitive advantage, and the article offers every indication that Steve role models this in an exemplary manner.

Whilst operating in a team environment, an emphasis on understanding and supporting individuals (players and staff) will remain a critical feature in the future of coaching. Reflecting on the opportunities to further understand individuals will likely present endless possibilities.

A Human Performance article brought to you by our Main Partners

By John Portch

“The first thing you need to ask is what does ‘resilience’ mean,” says Gareth Bloomfield.

The psychologist, who works with the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst, explains that it comes from the Latin ‘resilio’, which means ‘to bounce back’.

“It’s the ability of individuals or a team to bounce back from adversity,” Bloomfield continues. “I guess in most sports, analogous scenarios would be about a team losing. How does the team bounce back from a loss or maybe a series of losses? That goes for an individual as well, so if we’re talking about a tennis player or a golfer, someone who plays their sport on their own, how do they bounce back from a series of performances where they do not feel that they best delivered?

“There are a number of things that go into baking the cake of psychological resilience and they’re not just psychological because there’s a huge overlap between physical and psychological. If, for example, I’m a tennis player carrying an injury, surely that’s going to have a psychological impact that affects what I’m capable of on the court.”

Bloomfield, who spoke to the Leaders Performance Institute in March about how leaders can overcome resistance to change, here lays out the ‘ingredients’ of the cake that make up psychological resilience and where coaches can have an impact.

The flour – sleep

Bloomfield has emphasised the importance of sleep on more than one occasion. For him, its impact on our physical and mental health cannot be overstated, and, in his analogy of the cake, sleep is the flour. “One of the things I would do from a mental health perspective, if somebody was suffering from mental health symptoms such as anxiety and depression, one of the things I would look into is how much sleep do you get?” he says.

“It also affects our accuracy on a number of things: your ability to put a ball in the basket, your ability to hit a ball with a bat, strike a ball in the back of the net. Those are related to the quantity of sleep and the quality of sleep. It’s not just about quantity – it’s quality as well. A lot of the time, we’re not fully aware of the quality of sleep we get. Smartwatches are helping. Sleep is the flour in these ingredients of resilience.”

Leaders can educate athletes in the importance of sleep and, from there, the idea is that athletes will be able to take that knowledge, see its value, and monitor their own sleep. Bloomfield adds: “What you’re doing is priming them to make a decision. If you’re educating people, you’re educating them to make another decision later that they might not be conscious of. Educate them.”

The eggs – social support

The eggs of Bloomfield’s cake represent social support and its role as a factor in psychological resilience. “Isolation can happen with people around you,” he says. “We know that has a big effect on people’s performance as well.” The key for coaches is to “make sure that the team is cohesive and keep a check on relationships within the team.” A coach can go for regular check-ins with athletes to find how they are doing or identify any issues they may have both inside and beyond the team. “Not just one or two people – talk to many and make sure you get a good impression of what’s going on within the whole team,” adds Bloomfield.

Unique ingredients #1 – your goal-setting behaviours

Sleep and social support are universal but Bloomfield’s next ingredient, goal-setting, will look different depending on your team’s context. When it comes to goal-setting, there are some key questions to be asked. “How we set our goals or how our goals are set for us? Do you feel some sort of purpose? Do you feel like you’re making a difference in the goal that you’re striving towards? Because that then links in with the social aspect of it. Do you feel motivated towards that goal? Do you feel like you’ve got some sort of control over the goals that are being set or how you get towards them?

“You’ve got to make sure that as a leader people feel that they have the desired autonomy in the way that they reach those goals, that they know what goals they’re seeking to achieve.”

Support from coaches and peers is essential but it can also go back to the physical. “If you have an injury, that’s going to have an effect on other things, but you may have physical restrictions in terms of what you might be able to do.”

Unique ingredients #2 – your cognition and ability to learn

Bloomfield reveals that he was once an accomplished rower, but understood that his stature (he stands six-foot tall or “under six-foot without my trainers on”) prevented him from reaching an elite level. He tells the story to place further emphasis on the physical component of psychological resilience. He says: “my ability to be as good a rower as some of the rowers that are six-foot-eight, well, I’ve got a physical disadvantage and maybe my resilience, my capability to actually spring back, is then related to my physical ability to deal with the adversity. Lose and lose and lose and lose and lose again, well, I have to actually realise that my ability to spring back from this is physically restricted in some way.”

An individual may also be restricted in their ability to learn by factors beyond their control that impact their ability to process information in a cognitively sound fashion. “That’s fundamentally important because if you’ve got somebody who has a learning disability, then their ability to bounce back may be severely affected by the fact that they have a learning disability because they don’t necessarily remember what it is they need to do to be able to actually help themselves bounce back from the situation that they’re in,” adds Bloomfield.

Positive psychology – the science of hope

Bloomfield stresses that cognition is not just about one’s ability to learn but also one’s ability to talk to themselves in a way that generates persistence.

“And now we’re getting into the science of hope,” he says, “and that science of hope is how I talk to myself about myself personally. How I talk to myself about how permanent something is, and also about how something is pervasive.” He discusses the work of American psychologist Martin Seligman, who is considered one of the fathers of the movement of positive psychology. “This is psychology where we look at how do we get the best out of people and this is what I’m looking at in my research around psychological resilience,” continues Bloomfield.

“How do we get that little bit of extra out of people? One thing is training them to think in a slightly different way, so that when something goes wrong they don’t beat themselves up and when something is not how they want it to be they don’t think it’s always going to be like that and it affects everything else. This is something that we learn fairly early on in life.

“That cognition is really important because you can’t have a sportsperson like that. When they lose a match they can’t go ‘I’m an idiot. That happens every time. No matter what I do it’s going to go wrong.’ If they are doing that then we need to get inside their heads and change the cognitions that they have.”

Leaders, he explains, have a role in being optimistic in their words, actions and demeanour. “This is a recurring pattern for me, which is, to be a good leader you have to communicate optimism, because optimism equals persistence, and persistence is about winning the game, winning the war, whatever it is your business is. It’s an important aspect of what it is that you’re trying to achieve and persistence is resilience.”

By Sarah Evans

• Reconnect with your roots.

• Align to a bigger purpose.

• Empower and trust the athletes to make decisions.

Reconnect the playing group with the club’s history

Quins were languishing in sixth place in the Premiership in January 2021 and were without a head coaching figure. Six months later, their player-led squad were champions and this season reached the semi-finals again. The club’s Head of Rugby Performance Billy Millard took the reins and would hand control back to the playing group. Before that, he needed to restore confidence and re-establish a sense of purpose. He understood the need for the team to go back to their roots, to understand their history and culture. “Quins have always been entertainers, that’s why we’re ‘the Jesters’, and we had to tap back into that,” Millard told an audience at the 2021 Leaders Sport Performance Summit in London. The team created a clear vision which underpins everything they do, and means they are all aligned and striving for a greater purpose. They understand their history and what it means to play for Quins – it is more than just winning and the team is worth more than any individual. It is everyone’s responsibility to bring success to the club, everyone has their part to play, and therefore the sense of a team is embedded and felt even stronger.

Foster a sense of belonging

As soon as you understand and buy into the vision, values and culture, you are part of the Quins family and part of a legacy of Quins players who want to keep this culture alive, explained Danny Care, the Quins and England international scrum-half, who spoke onstage with Millard. Every player is there to bring Quins success, and to do that every individual must give 100% for the good of the team. “One of the key reasons we were successful, was having 45 players fighting for the same goal”, explained Care. It was a whole squad effort, not just the 23 playing at the weekend. Each player also has the freedom to be themselves, and is not put in a box, they are accepted and allowed to express themselves as they are aligned to the higher purpose, and belong to the group. Enjoying the process and feeling part of something bigger is often more fulfilling than simply winning, and Care stated emphatically that winning at Quins, where he has played since he was 19, “was the proudest moment of my career”. It is the sense of winning with your team who have been pulling towards the same goal for a higher purpose that adds to the achievement and success.

Trust, respect and empowerment

The staff value demonstrated that they valued the players’ opinions by asking them to take ownership of the programme and how they wanted to act within it. “I’ve never known an environment where we’ve felt more empowered because we were asked questions,” Care said. The players are empowered to think about what will get the best out of them, what they want, the most crucial piece being that their input is listened to and therefore they feel respected and trusted. This allows the players to feel valued but also in turn holds them accountable to their actions and decisions. The players must be able to understand what gets the best out of themselves as individuals and as a team. The support staff are also listened to and empowered to make decisions on the running of the programme. “Everyone was accountable and empowered and they really enjoyed it,” explained Millard. They are given autonomy and their expertise is listened to, therefore further increasing their feeling of being trusted and respected.

Have a family-first approach to people

Care emphasised the importance of making each individual feel seen as a human and not just an athlete or part of a machine. They took a family-first approach, knowing that whilst, yes, rugby and winning is important, people have lives outside of this and family is everything. Millard gave a brilliant example of one player’s mother being unwell during the week of the most important game of the season. The coaching staff and team’s response was “family comes first, just go,” says Millard. The player came back for the weekend and played exceptionally well – he had been understood and cared for as a human. Care highlighted from a players perspective, that decision from the coaching staff “filtered through the rest of the squad, and we feel empowered, trusted and listened to.”

Operating from a sense of belief not fear

The player-led approach to training and taking ownership breeds a sense of confidence that you have done everything in your power to prepare correctly. Confidence that the game plan is the best way for you to be successful, and trusting the processes in order to achieve your outcome goal. This is critical mid game when things might not be going your way, “by sticking to what we believe, what we’ve trained” explained Care. Having a unified approach is the best approach for success, and players not going off script trying to solve the problem individually.  If you lose, which any team is bound to do, believing and trusting in the team’s process and not panicking. This is embedded from the owners and filters down the club giving everyone confidence that their position isn’t under threat from one or two negative results. Operating on a sense of belief and confidence rather than fear. Belief in the individual’s ability but also that of everyone around them.

By Sarah Evans

Recommended reading

What Does Deloitte Think Makes an Inclusive Leader?

Four Factors when Making Diversity Work for your Team

How Inclusivity Unlocks Innovation and Performance at Selfridges

Framing the topic

A topic which has come up a number of times as an area of focus or improvement for many of the teams in our membership is how to create more inclusive environments, especially in high performance sport. In this topic-led virtual roundtable we had a great conversation about what many of our members were currently doing to promote ED&I [equality, diversity & inclusion] within their environments and areas which they were finding challenging.

Key areas of interest identified by the group:

• Being able to attract diverse talent
• Exploring the performance benefits of diverse workforces
• Understanding the barriers that may exist
• Working with data as a starting point

 Discussion points:

1. What are you currently doing to promote ED&I within your organisations

• We currently have 12 work streams working on ED&I to remove the structural and cultural barriers that exist in the pathway with regards to Talent ID, Scouting, education, finances, and the transition between different groups.
• Collecting data in the first instance is key. Understanding the feeling around the club and how to create an inclusive culture. We ran surveys, and were able to break them down by area and demographic. We could understand what areas need training around inclusivity. We conducted exit interviews, and we were able to understand unconscious biases.
• We have introduced ‘Community Challenge Champions’ to connect the formal pathways with the informal. This allows us to expand the pathway and reach clubs where our scouts wouldn’t normally go, or where they wouldn’t introduce kids to the pathway.
• Having inclusion as the basis is key. If you can become more inclusive, diversity is a consequence. Whereas, if you start with diversity, we found it actually made it more divisive and grouped people too much. Understanding what you need to create and develop an inclusive culture – you can have the diversity but if the inclusion isn’t there, you won’t keep your diverse talent.
• We’ve partnered with colleges we wouldn’t have partnered with in the past, and have sponsored students where they would not have previously got funding. We have a Student of the Year programme for engineering projects where the winner gets a two-week work experience placement and funding towards their studies. This provides an opportunity for people who wouldn’t have got a chance before, people we wouldn’t have seen before, providing a wider and broader talent pool. We also offer people who have been displaced at work to come in for a 12-month ‘academy’ placement and give them an opportunity. It has been highly successful and we wouldn’t have recruited people from these backgrounds previously. We converted at a rate of 48%, our interns converted at 33%, and the transition of graduates to permanent roles was at 75%.
• We have a Women in Engineering programme and a Diversity and Inclusion group led by our employees. We have brought in females from motorsport to talk about their struggles. We’ve redesigned our internal communication and included an international calendar with religious holidays and key dates. We want to be able to break down myths and help to understand religions and what impact that has on people, what we can do to support them.
• We identified that only 12% of coaches were female, and so thought ‘well, why do we need females?’ We conducted interviews to prove the performance benefit of diverse coaching and leadership and 72% of the women interviewed were strongly influenced by a female mentor. Therefore we proved there was a need for more female coaches as a performance gain and this evidence was key in securing more funding for diverse coaching.
• Learning from the lived experiences of underrepresented players or coaches has been a really powerful way of growing and developing in this space. We believe it is ‘learning not training’. Often people’s thought is ‘we need training in this’ but actually we first need to learn about it. Using lived experience can have a bigger impact than just going through paid training.
• Diversity of thinking is also crucial and we often get someone in from outside of our department to join sport-specific meetings to provide a different set of eyes and see if there is anything we might have missed through our own lens.

2. What are the challenges or barriers that you are facing?

• The biggest challenge we have is attracting diverse talent to the club. Being able to attract a more diverse applicant pool at the first job level is a key work-on area.
• Having the confidence to make decisions without being in fear of making decisions, and getting something wrong.
• We have found it hard with the dataset that we currently have based on how we collect that data. If the pool of data isn’t diverse, does it help? We are using focus groups to help clarify the position and better understand where thinking is going. What data do you collect and how do you use it?
• We are very conscious of trying to solve a problem we’re not experiencing – ‘don’t mark our own homework’. We need people who are genuinely going through these challenges to help us understand them better rather than just assuming we know them. The risk is that we treat EDI as one thing rather than unpacking what it really is, and why you are going about a specific area. It is not a box-ticking exercise, we need to be strategic in what we go after and why.
• Being ‘colour blind’ – the notion that this might be a negative because you can’t see the discrimination because you don’t discriminate. We need to talk to those being discriminated against to understand what it is like for them. It’s often not overt racism, but white normative, and we almost reinforce it by talking about the ‘other’, and so being guarded against that.
• Women’s coaching scholarship programme – we want to change perceptions that these things are in place because they don’t get the opportunities that men do. It’s not just about increasing diversity, it’s about giving people opportunities that others don’t get. The challenge is changing the perceptions of people who believe that if the makeup of a coaching team is 50:50 male, female, that was because you planned it that way from a scheme, not because they were the best for the job.

By Lorena Torres Ronda

At the top level of high performance, there is constant pressure to achieve success.

In the pursuit of success, there is likely to be more than one ‘good’ performance plan. Success can be viewed through a number of different prisms, can be defined in very different ways, and can be achieved through a range of approaches.

Leadership styles can be formal (bestowed through job title or position) or more informal (such as the role of influencers) but it is the leader who sets the values and principles of work that will fundamentally mark the direction of the project. The vision for a project – and the path to success – will be determined by the leader.

The identity of that leader, or leaders, is significant. There are, for example, world-renowned teams whose organizational values outweigh the aura of the individual. These include the New Zealand All Blacks, the NBA’s San Antonio Spurs or, more recently, English Premier League champions Manchester City. They are known for being winners and have what is widely regarded as a ‘great culture’. Yes, they have or have had charismatic leaders, whether it’s players, coaches or managers, but there is no single individual on these teams who is bigger than the team and their pursuit of success.

Of late, however, there are certain organizations where leadership appears to be driven by an individual (often a star player). Are there serious repercussions to this approach in the present and future of these organizations?

Organizational leadership

Who sets the overall vision of an organization? That person should know today’s vision and understand where is it going. That sounds good in theory but, as noted above, this is an era where players have a lot of power – in some cases even more than the coach or the manager. In fact, there are some organizations who deliver the present and the destiny of the organization to the star, or franchise player, of the current moment. This can involve enlisting them to shape the vision and it can also include eliciting the ideas and opinions of the superstar in the construction and direction of the team, which remains paramount. Any team adopting this approach must do so with caution since it may negatively impact the direction of the organization and the individuals that collectively form the team. These people (from managers to interns) will be the ones that, at the end of the day, should promote and act according to the values on which the organization is based.

The leaders who hold the vision, present and future, are the ones responsible for creating and communicating this vision, conveying direction and meaning. Moreover, they also have the responsibility for building the structure of the team, creating the roles, responsibilities or points of interdependence. And, finally, motivating individuals so that they follow the vision (with shared vision, goals and objectives) and support the development of its staff members with a view to retaining talent within the organization (especially in a moment where staff members are willing to leave when working under conditions that do not allow for personal development, professional growth; where there can be a frustrating environment, egos, unnecessary pressure, inadequate remuneration for responsibilities and role, and the like).

Individual leadership

Leadership can derive from formal leadership – the leader’s title or position in the organization – but also from a charismatic personality. As a leader, one has to ask: what kind of leader do you want and hope to be? In management or director positions, dedicating time to others, planning and guiding will be a fundamental part of those roles; a work oriented to the development of others is also part of the mission. Therefore, in thinking about what characteristics are going to define you as a leader, it will be essential to have a base of coherence, that your thoughts, words and actions are on the line.

However, when a leader is at the service of others, a facilitator to accompany, direct, guide, etc., there must be a safe environment. Knowing who is ‘the boss’, meaning who will make the final decision (leadership or players) will be important in the process of building the entity’s vision and mission, for the short or long run.

Charismatic leaders can present themselves as true towers of strength, but it is difficult to succeed alone. Create a work team that makes you a better leader, a work team that helps you, advises you, provides perspective and supports and celebrates the moments of success with you. It is also important to let others lead. Natural-informal (non-formal) leaders can have a lot of influence on certain projects, and on people, as they can be very powerful. Detecting natural leaders, guiding them and at the same time giving them autonomy can be a formidable tool for a high performance program.

Strategic leadership

The mission, the vision and the core values should be above those of the individual, although they emanate from a visionary leader, and the management must ensure that the behaviors are in line with these. Defining who in the organization manages and leads the vision of where you are and where you are going should not be dependent on individuals, even if these individuals are strong promoters of the vision.

Now: where does the balance need to sit between meeting long-term goals (such as player development, injury prevention or the future of the organization) and the need to win ‘today’?

There is a trend across pro sports that organizations with less competitive pressure are capable of building projects with medium and long-term visions, working in safer areas, building from collaboration, guidance and delegation, managing egos, innovation, creativity and job security. Stability, trust, protection or support seems to allow talent to develop their tasks in a safer environment, with innovation and creativity and at the same time with room for improvement when things are not going in the right direction or aren’t working well. However, the moment the team begins to have ‘winning’ goals and pressure, or when it builds around a certain core of players, does something then happen? Are those environments more pressured by the umbrella of fear? Does this happen specifically in big markets? Is there a different culture depending on the market (small vs big) in the long term goals? Who is responsible for ensuring the environment that protects the identity of the organization?

In conclusion, it is worth reflecting on the words of renowned American investor Ray Dalio, who said: “An organization is a machine consisting in two major parts: culture and people.” He explained that you need to get the right culture and the right people, and for any organization to function well, “its work principles must be aligned with its members’ life principles”, so that the vision is clear, and the mission is shared.