Leaders in Business
  • Membership
  • Events
  • Content
  • Virtual Learning
  • Connections
  • Partners
Login
  • Leaders Week London
  • Events
    • Leaders Week London
    • Leaders Sports Awards
    • Leaders Club Events
    • Leaders Performance Institute Events
    • Leaders Meet: Innovation
  • Memberships
    • The Leaders Club
    • Leaders Performance Institute
  • About
    • Careers
    • Contact
I’m a sports leader:
  • Off The Field For those focused on the business of the sport View more
  • On The Field For those working with an athlete or elite team View more
  • Login
    • Leaders ClubThe membership for future sport business leaders
    • Leaders Performance InstituteThe membership for elite performance practitioners
  • Newsletters
Performance Institute Leaders Performance Institute Logo
  • Membership
  • Events
  • Content
  • Virtual Learning
  • Connections
  • Partners
Login
Members Only

17 Nov 2023

Articles

‘This Will Be the First Measurement Tool for Culture’

Category
Data & Innovation, Premium
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/this-will-be-the-first-measurement-tool-for-culture/

Gary McCoy discusses Peak AI and its ability to track personality traits and emotional welfare.

A Data & Innovation article brought to you by

sport techie
By Joe Lemire
How are you feeling today?”

That was the question longtime performance coach Gary McCoy would ask his players each day, listening to the answers but also reading body language for subtle cues.

McCoy had success blending those daily check-ins with objective monitoring data from a series of tracking technologies, overseeing what’s likely the only injury-free professional baseball season with Taiwan’s Chinatrust Brothers in 2019.

In his latest venture, however, McCoy is the CEO of the previously stealth startup Peak AI that asks that same question, or a similar variation, and then leverages psycholinguistics and natural language processing to gain objective data for cognitive load — the amount of information that working memory can hold at one time — and emotional welfare.

Put simply, Peak AI seeks to identify traits and states — that is, to understand a user’s ingrained personality traits, which are largely invariable, and his or her daily state of mind, as influenced by physical and mental stresses.

“Psychology leads physiology,” McCoy said, outlining his assessment model that begins with psychological-emotional well-being before addressing physical systems, technical ability and then tactical use of the athlete. “It starts there, but I never had anything to measure it.”

For ongoing monitoring, users upload a video recording of about 30 seconds, and then Peak AI analyzes both the word choice and manner of speaking to determine one’s frame of mind. For more static attributes, such as a person’s need for group affiliation or attitude toward risk, any audio sample will work, even publicly available interviews. The AI is able to account for varying languages and accents, as well as identify attempts to trick it, such as reading a script.

McCoy, who lives in Arizona, eight time zones away from Chief Innovation Officer Walter Farfan, completed daily assessments through London-based Peak AI. One day, after saying what he thought was the usual response, McCoy received a call from a worried Farfan asking what was wrong. McCoy hadn’t said anything about it, but the intonation and timbre of his words triggered an alert. Turns out McCoy’s dog of 19 years had died the day before.

Mental wellness is the overarching mission, Farfan said, who was invited to give a talk on the subject at Buckingham Palace. Some early applications in the sports realm include individualized coaching, helping athletes reach their potential by appealing to their intrinsic motivation, rearranging clubhouse locker assignments to improve team culture, and scouting prospects to evaluate if they are a roster fit. It’s then easy to extrapolate its use from performance to other business operations, such as the mental health and culture of executive teams.

Peak AI completed seed funding rounds in July and now has a staff of six full-time employees and about a dozen contractors. The company charges $99 per month per athlete for the product. The plan is a limited rollout this year, followed by a broad deployment to teams in 2024.

Among the pro teams to have trialed or adopted the product from Peak AI include EFL Championship and Premier League sides Southampton and Brentford, Ligue 1 power Paris Saint-Germain, Formula One teams Red Bull and Aston Martin, and the NHL’s New Jersey Devils, who are the first to do so in North America.

After an assessment, Farfan said, “I’m going to speak to you about utilizing what you have internally, what you’re born with, what you’ve inherited — these unbelievable skill sets within your personality — to bring the best out of you, rather than trying to make something you’re not. And I can’t change your personality. But if I knew [what it was], I can use verbalization to say, ‘Well, I now see how you see the world.’”

Personality is roughly 70% inherited and 30% shaped by experience, Farfan estimated. And metadata analyses of large cohorts are helping unlock characteristics that underpin certain achievements, which could range from hitting home runs in baseball to excelling as an outdoor athlete in the cold climates of Scandinavia.

“We allow our clients to port in different youth players — and whatever they deem success looks like — and that builds a dataset for them to go and build a lens to shine on a group of youngsters to see which one of you 100 people have this specific trait,” he said.

Farfan and his longtime business partner, CTO Mike Blaster, have been collaborating for a decade on the study and automated analysis of language. They applied those techniques to sentiment analysis of social media posts and the development of marketing campaigns. They launched Trace Data Science in 2017 to parse ingrained human behavior from milder interests and to map cognitive load. The company worked out of Google’s London office from 2018 to 2020 as part of an incubator program.

Peak AI is a rebrand to reflect a change in mission. Farfan said external validation work is ongoing at the University of Georgia and Portsmouth University. Some prior studies have indicated the system’s ability to predict intrinsic motivation, cognitive load and personality traits at rates of 90% or higher.

McCoy said this sensitive personal information will be protected with military-grade security and be in accordance with HIPAA and all similar international medical privacy laws. A seasoned sports tech executive, McCoy was an early employee at Catapult whose signature GPS devices tracked stress on the body, at Whoop whose wearables assessed the body’s response to and recovery from that stress, and at Zone7, whose AI algorithms sought to predict injury risk.

The one piece missing was cognitive evaluation, especially not something that could be administered with so little friction. One persistent conundrum, McCoy said, was that “physically in an athlete, exhaustion and boredom present the same way. How do you know what to do?”

“We think sports psychologists will be the ones who have now a very accurate and effective tool, but they can prioritize, ‘OK, I need to attend to this person,’” he said.

“We’re teaching them how to be chameleons and how to interact with [every player]. It’s team culture. You hear that word all the time in sports clubs, right? But no one’s got a measurement tool for it. This, I think, will be the first measurement tool for culture.”

This article was brought to you by SBJ Tech, a Leaders Group company. As a Leaders Performance Institute member, you are able to enjoy exclusive access to SBJ Tech content in the field of athletic performance.

16 Nov 2023

Podcasts

The People Behind the Tech Podcast: Dr Daniel Laby – Sports Vision Specialist

Category
Data & Innovation, Human Performance
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/podcasts/the-people-behind-the-tech-podcast-dr-daniel-laby-sports-vision-specialist/

Dr Daniel Laby is talking to John Portch and Joe Lemire about his vision training with Liverpool and England star Trent Alexander-Arnold in 2021.

A Data & Innovation podcast brought to you in collaboration with

sport techie

Not a member and want more content like this? Speak to our team.
Dr Daniel Laby is talking to John Portch and Joe Lemire about his vision training with Liverpool and England star Trent Alexander-Arnold in 2021.

He says: “If the question is: ‘are you worse than you should be for your sport?’ And knowing what each sport needs, if you have that information you can say how someone needs to train.”

Red Bull commissioned the project having been impressed by Dr Laby’s consultancy work in the NFL and his burgeoning collection of World Series rings having worked for three decades in MLB.

“So if Trent did well, which he did in certain areas [I would say], ‘Trent, you did great. We don’t have to give you glasses’ but if [instead I said] ‘Trent, your ability to monitor multiple targets at the same time isn’t what it needs to be compared to what it should be for someone on average of your level, we have to train that’; and that’s what we did with Trent.”

Dr Laby tells The People Behind the Tech podcast that the first goal is to help athletes to correct to the required level for their sport, which will differ depending on the discipline.

This was just one aspect touched upon during the conversation. Others include:

  • The potential drawbacks of refractive surgery for athletes in some sports [8:00];
  • His work with Manny Ramírez and the 2004 Boston Red Sox [16:00];
  • Balancing research and practice in his work [22:00];
  • The potential for using virtual and augmented reality in vision testing [36:00].

Joe Lemire LinkedIn | X

John Portch LinkedIn | X

Listen above and subscribe today on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher and Overcast, or your chosen podcast platform.

23 Oct 2023

Articles

Do you Sense your Staff Holding their Tongues? If so, Perhaps it’s Time to Ask yourself if you Are as Good a Listener as you Think

Category
Leadership & Culture
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/do-you-sense-your-staff-holding-their-tongues-if-so-perhaps-its-time-to-ask-yourself-if-you-are-as-good-a-listener-as-you-think/

In his latest column, Iain Brunnschweiler explains why listening – and having the humility to listen well – is the special sauce of the best teams.

By Iain Brunnschweiler
Your heartbeat is racing, and you’ve got a sick feeling in your stomach.

You are about to walk into a meeting with the rest of your leadership team and you know that you’ve got something to say to add value to the conversation. However, the dynamic in the room means that you already know that you will hold your tongue and won’t feel comfortable to say what you really think.

Sound familiar? If it doesn’t, then you’ve done extremely well to navigate a career thus far without this experience!

For the majority of us, this kind of feeling may have occurred a handful of times, or it may have occurred hundreds of times. You might be reading this thinking that this is exactly how you will be feeling either tomorrow, or later this week.

Seeking optimal

This situation surely cannot be optimal. It cannot be optimal for the individual who is suffering the anxiety-inducing thoughts, and it certainly cannot be optimal for the business who is deploying this group of people to work together.

Whether in business, music, sport or military, the ability for us to maximise the combined forces of those ‘in the room’ is absolutely paramount for success. And, more importantly, for the humans involved to feel comfortable enough to contribute and feel valued.

One of my key focus areas in recent years has been supporting people to work better together. In sports, a key objective has been to look at what is broadly termed ‘co-coaching’.

Co-coaching is the ability for multiple coaches to work together in the same coaching session. With growing support staffs, often in elite team sports today there will be two or three technical coaches, along with multiple other specialists such as strength & conditioning coaches, analysts, psychologists and physiotherapists. With all of these expert practitioners on the same field at the same time, the coordination of their roles and responsibilities is paramount. So, co-coaching could describe two coaches working together with the same squad, in the same session. Or it could be an entire support staff of seven or eight working together at the same time. This can get pretty complicated, and it is very easy for their to be a lack of role clarity, which results in a lack of impact on player development.

In my experience, there are three broad, fundamental qualities needed to co-coach effectively. They are:

1) Having an aligned purpose or intended outcome.

2) Having clarity on individuals roles in order to achieve the outcome.

3) Having a level of respect for the other members of the team and the contribution they are making.

The special sauce

As my old boss, the relentlessly successful Simon Timson (currently the Performance Director at Manchester City) once said to me, we need “no precious professional boundaries”. What the heck does that mean, I hear you cry!?

Well, I learned, and then experienced exactly what that meant during my time at England Cricket. We had a performance support team comprising technical coaches, an operations team, a physio, S&C coach, analyst, psychologist and education/welfare coaches. Similar teams will be present in many sports performance/development environments.

However, I have rarely experienced these teams operating anywhere near optimally together. And that’s where Simon’s wonderful phrase comes in.

For example, as the head coach of a national age group team, I embraced the view of the physio. This is not uncommon, he is a highly qualified technical expert in his field. However, it was not just his physio-medical view that I would be seeking. I would also genuinely embrace his view on the way a batter had approached an innings, or the field setting that we were going with during a youth international match. That’s what it means, that is what Simon meant. As a staff, we were aware that there was a high level of technical expertise in our own fields, but the special sauce was that we trusted each other to provide a view that wasn’t necessarily in our lane. The fast bowling coach could genuinely provide a view on the gym programme or the analyst discuss the education provision. This feeling that we had amongst us is rare. Too many times I have seen people being shut down because the leader in the room was not open to a level of cognitive diversity. Their mind was shut to the fact that someone deemed to be a non-technical coach might actually have value to add.

So what led this group to come to this place? I think there was one fundamental skill that we worked on, got better at, and evolved: listening.

It sounds simple, but how often do you REALLY listen to your colleagues? Listen to understand. Listen with all of your senses. Listen for the story behind the story, for the values or beliefs that might be guiding the narrative. To create and hold space for the contribution of others, as a leader, rather than to fill it with your own preconceived ideas or to confirm your own biases.

Listening is a whole lot harder than it sounds. Especially when the heat is on, and decisions need to be made. Listening takes energy and it takes attention. It is also really easy to hear what you want to hear rather than what is really being said. I have often asked a player “How was training today?” To which the answer is almost invariably “Good, thanks”! Only by asking a better question such as “What did you learn in training today?”, or “What made you think the most in training today?”, and then really listening carefully to the answer have I unlocked conversations with players that I never thought I would have.

So when you reflect on your own contribution to a team, or specifically a team meeting, please do consider the role you are playing. Are you causing anxiety in others, to the point at which they may not say the one thing that could be critical to success? Are you creating and holding the space to genuinely listen? Because if you aren’t, then you’ll almost certainly be making much worse decisions due to not having the full picture from all of the minds you’ve got in the team.

Questions for leaders:

  • How aware are you of how members of your team are feeling in different meetings?
  • To what extent do you embrace the thinking of someone who may not be a technical expert in that area? (Some call this a ‘naïve expert’)
  • How much of your energy and skill are you protecting to genuinely listen?

Iain Brunnschweiler runs the Focus Performance Consultancy. He is a former professional cricketer, has authored two published books, and most recently was the Head of Technical Development at Southampton Football Club.

4 Sep 2023

Articles

Why Being Able to Action your Team’s Data Quickly Can Give you a Critical Performance Edge

Category
Data & Innovation
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/why-being-able-to-action-your-teams-data-quickly-can-give-you-a-critical-performance-edge/

Crystal Palace and Royal Antwerp have developed data storage and visualisation systems that increase athlete availability, enable smarter recruitment, and ensure more efficient workflows.

An article brought to you by our Partners

By John Portch
“If you want to be successful in this industry you really need to make sure that you have data-related skills alongside your sports background.”

Dr Cedric Leduc, a sports scientist at English Premier League club Crystal Palace FC, is sharing his experience with practitioners working in athlete monitoring.

It is a natural enough recommendation for a sports scientist to make but the case Leduc makes to the Leaders Performance Institute is compelling. “If you aim to work in a sports club as a practitioner,” he continues, “one of the key things when considering your own learning and development journey is to integrate some of those data skills that will help you to understand what is actually required by an organisation when it comes to data and technology.”

Why a data infrastructure is important

Leduc, who has been at Crystal Palace for almost two years, addresses that question on a daily basis. “How can I refine a thousand possible metrics on the market into a presentation or construct of what I am seeking to present?” As he sees it, there are two viable approaches; firstly, by calling upon his own experience and relationships with colleagues, coaches and athletes; and secondly, by running statistical analyses that enable those selections to be made in an objective way.

Crystal Palace and Royal Antwerp track Player Availability using Smartabase, which enables performance staff and coaches to make informed training and performance decisions. Image: Smartabase

“A combination of both works,” he says. “When you have to turn things around quickly, you might actually use your experience, but when you have time and access to a good historical database, you might be able to run those analyses. There’s a trade-off between short-term actionable points and more long-term objective decisions.”

Leduc and Crystal Palace use human performance optimisation platform Smartabase as a data storage and visualisation solution for all players and staff, from the academy to the first team.

“In a way, building the system from nothing was an advantage because you can build it the way you like and set up the structure” – Peter Catteeuw

To operate without such a system puts a club at a disadvantage, as Dr Peter Catteeuw, the Head of Performance at Belgian Pro League champions Royal Antwerp FC, explains.

“When I arrived at Antwerp in 2017 there were no records of injuries, records of tests with the players, no records of training sessions and so on,” he tells the Leaders Performance Institute. Mindful of how well Smartabase had served him in his previous role at Racing Genk, he began to use their technology at his new club, building a monitoring system for a second time with the help of Smartabase’s agile customer success team.

“In a way, building the system from nothing was an advantage because you can build it the way you like and set up the structure,” he says. “It’s still changing every day and getting better, helping players from the academy to the first team. The team’s management and administration is also coming onboard.”

It is a product of the latitude afforded to Catteeuw and his ability to scale the system. “We needed time to build the system to our own needs and it continues to develop. On the other hand, we can implement changes immediately.”

Smartabase enables the collection of both objective and subjective sources of data relating to athlete wellness. Image: Smartabase

Of advice he would give a team who are starting from scratch, Catteeuw says, “You can easily start with a smaller group within the club, say the academy, and then progress through the organisation as you build the system.”

How accessible and actionable data can improve workflows

Alignment and accessibility are critical for new members of staff. When Leduc arrived at Crystal Palace, his first question was: where is the data and can I access it easily? “Then you start to realise that you have multiple data sources like in any sports organisation,” he says. “What’s important, if you want to make practical use of that data, is to first make sure they are stored in one secured place so that it can be easily accessed – then you can turn that into something actionable.”

“We have a holistic view of the players; what they did in training, what they are doing outside of training, how well they are recovering every day and if they are ready to train or take on more load or not, and if they are ready to play games or not” – Peter Catteeuw

At Royal Antwerp, Catteeuw welcomes the ability to tailor the club’s data management platform to his wishes thanks to Smartabase’s hands-on approach to customer success. A response within hours is the norm. A solution often follows in a day or two. “Most systems are fixed but Smartabase gives you the tools to create your own club system to enable you to work the way you like with physios, strength & conditioning staff, the technical coaches and management. Most companies only make it if it’s interesting for other teams.”

Injury Risk Profiling is an essential area of Catteeuw’s work at Royal Antwerp. Image: Peter Catteeuw / Royal Antwerp FC

Leduc has witnessed the benefit first-hand at Crystal Palace. “A new player signed this summer and the head physio asked me if he can integrate the profile of that new player so that he can start adding notes,” he says. “Another example from pre-season was the request to implement a new technology, integrating its data with their Smartabase storage system.” The organisation was able to facilitate the club’s request. “They are very reactive in trying to understand your needs and not simply relying on what already exists.”

At Royal Antwerp, Catteeuw was able to make the API work in linking the sleep tracker Whoop and Smartabase. “Now it’s up to me to pick the right data, the data we want to see, and make clarifications if necessary,” he says. “I will make the first simple dashboards for ourselves, the medical staff or the coaches to have a quick view every day. In the next days, I will try to combine data we have now from Whoop with the players’ wellness questionnaires and with all the training and game data we collect so that we have a holistic view of the players; what they did in training, what they are doing outside of training, how well they are recovering every day and if they are ready to train or take on more load or not, and if they are ready to play games or not.”

Agility is critical to data-informed decision making

There is the imminent possibility that this process will lead to red flags with some of the players. Perhaps they have not slept well on a consistent basis. This will, however, not lead to an overreaction from Catteeuw and his colleagues.

“We don’t have to take drastic action right away. These alarms just let us say ‘let’s first talk to the player and see what’s going on’ and then maybe check with the physios. Is there something else from the medical staff? Is there something from the training pitch that also raises an alarm?”

Catteeuw recalls an illustrative example from last season when Royal Antwerp used NordBord, ForceFrame and ForceDecks in strength testing. “In every first training session after a match, we ran tests. The data gives us a signal i.e. it’s too slow for these players, the difference between left and right is too large. We won’t pull them out of training immediately but we’ll check the player and see if there’s anything too serious to let them train. But most of the time it means we maybe have to adapt a little bit of training or we need to get an additional session in the gym.”

“Having access to the original data enables you to be very agile with the data you’re collecting” – Cedric Leduc

Access to the initial sources of raw data has enabled Leduc at Crystal Palace to streamline some of his processes. “The initial data collection with a given technology can be pushed into Smartabase in the right format,” he says. “I can then push it to get the right visualisation or run some analysis on it in a very straightforward way. You limit human interaction, which decreases the risk of errors. Having access to the original data enables you to be very agile with the data you’re collecting.”

However you use your databases, the important thing is to understand the needs of your organisation. As Leduc says: “Do you need a storage or visualisation solution? That will depend on your organisation.”

Crystal Palace and Royal Antwerp use Smartabase to track player soreness on a daily basis. Image: Smartabase.

The data landscape is changing and the days of teams failing to track even basic performance metrics are largely consigned to the past. In addition to Crystal Palace and Royal Antwerp, Smartabase clients include both Arsenal and Nottingham Forest in the Premier League, Stoke City in the English Championship, to AS Monaco in the French Ligue 1, Ajax in the Dutch Eredivisie and SL Benfica in the Portuguese Primeira Liga – all clubs looking to make a real difference both in training and in competition by developing a data infrastructure that enables coaches, practitioners and the players themselves to make faster, smarter and better informed decisions.

Members Only

1 Sep 2023

Articles

Access, Portability and Control – How FIFPRO Is Seeking to Help Players with their Performance Data

Category
Data & Innovation, Premium
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/access-portability-and-control-how-fifpro-is-seeking-to-help-players-with-their-performance-data/

The world soccer union wants greater education and regulation around data that can help to prevent injury and improve performance.

A Data & Innovation article brought to you by

sport techie
By Joe Lemire
When the International Federation of Professional Footballers (FIFPRO) General Secretary Jonas Baer-Hoffmann appeared at the Future of Sport conference in Paris in June, he described athlete data as “the third big-value contribution the players make to the sport industry,” following their on-field performance and image rights.

Such a statement reflects data’s evaluated status in modern sports. Yet while name, image and likeness rights have been commercialized extensively in professional sports, data rights are a nascent field, evolving at varying speeds based on club cooperation, league and union maturity and legal jurisdiction. There’s a wide range of data collected, too, inclusive of GPS vests, optical tracking cameras, force plates, heart rate monitors and more.

FIFPRO, the consortium representing 66 global professional soccer unions, recently announced its grand ambition to tackle the issue itself, serving as an accelerant of a universal solution across soccer. The idea, Baer-Hoffmann said, is to “translate the highest standard of data protection legislation” into a centralized platform whose development is led by FIFPRO with the athletes’ interests at the center.

The Netherlands-headquartered FIFPRO started exploring rights and protections of athlete data about five years ago. A survey it conducted during the 2020-21 season reported that 80% of pro players rated their interest in using data as at least an 8 on a 1-to-10 scale. Only about half, however, had full access to it or even understood why and how it was collected.

This led to the Charter of Player Data Rights that FIFPRO created in collaboration with FIFA and published in September 2022. Athletes’ three primary expectations for data was codified in that document — access, portability and control — and followed the framework of stringent privacy protections instituted by the European Union’s GDPR and others.

FIFPRO’s work is independent of the Project Red Card lawsuit — through which 1,400 cricket, football and rugby players are seeking compensation for what they consider unlawful use of athlete data — but it espouses the same underlying legal reasoning.

The first test case of this plan was the FIFA player app made available to all participants in the men’s World Cup 2022 in Qatar last December and again in July and August this year for the Women’s World Cup 2023 in Australia and New Zealand.

“We obviously have much higher ambitions and ambitions that go well beyond a World Cup environment but really go throughout the entire career parameters of any of the professional players around the world,” Baer-Hoffmann said, “whether it’s club, whether it’s country, whether that’s commercial partners, whether that is high performance coaching, etc., with all the different applications, risks and opportunities that come with it.”

FIFPRO has not announced any technology partners, but the expectation is that one or more third-party vendors will help build the product, which Baer-Hoffmann estimated will take six to nine months. Educating and onboarding athletes across so many leagues and countries will take considerable time as well.

The scope of global soccer makes FIFPRO’s task daunting while some individual unions have begun seeking their own solutions, with the NWSL Players Association partnering last week with BreakAway Data for use of its athlete data passport app.

“One of the things that’s become very clear is that an athlete’s right to have access to their own data is important, but it’s not very practical unless there’s actually a tool to make that access easy,” NWSLPA Executive Director Meghann Burke said.

Baer-Hoffmann contended that most current uses of athlete data by clubs could be easily challenged legally, but he was clear that athletes don’t seek to shut down all such uses and want to preserve the many benefits of preventing injury and improving performance — just with agency over how it’s used. The data platform, he added, can help bring to life the privacy rights that are often “very technocratic, and the enforcement is very, very legalistic.”

“A natural phenomenon that is happening at the minute is that the innovation potential, in the private sector around sports data and technology, is just a whole lot faster than the regulatory response, which is the case in many parts of society, right?” he said. “Usually technology just exponentially grows faster than the regulatory capabilities of institutions that govern the country or a certain sector.”

Basic game stats such as goals scored and shots saved plainly reside in the public domain. MRI results and bloodwork are clearly private medical records. But the performance data in question — biomechanics, movement patterns, heart rate — sits “somewhere in between, and which way should it lean?” BreakAway Data CEO Dave Anderson said.

Volumetric data, such as Hawk-Eye’s ability to track 29 points on the body for 3D motion capture, is an example of the increasingly granular data that prompted Anderson to conclude “that performance data is starting to lean more and more towards health data and that it’s vital to understand, how much wear and tear is on these guys?”

Commercial opportunities for the data are possible, too. The NFLPA is among the unions investigating that market fit, partnering with Sports Data Labs last year to explore possible revenue generation potential.

“We ultimately view your personal data — if you’re an athlete, a patient, a citizen with a watch that collects data — as a digital asset,” Sports Data Labs CEO Mark Gorski said, before cautioning that such assets won’t immediately lead to new income. “Most people want to talk about the end use case. There’s a whole bunch of steps that have to be taken in the right way in order to get there. What we’re spending part of our time with is really helping groups navigate some of those complexities on a global level.”

This article was brought to you by SBJ Tech, a Leaders Group company. As a Leaders Performance Institute member, you are able to enjoy exclusive access to SBJ Tech content in the field of athletic performance.

23 Aug 2023

Articles

Easy, Accessible, Social and Timely: Exploring the Environmental Nudges Available to Coaches in High Performance

Category
Coaching & Development, Leadership & Culture
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/easy-accessible-social-and-timely-exploring-the-environmental-nudges-available-to-coaches-in-high-performance/

In the second half of a our two-part interview, physical performance coach Ben Rosenblatt discusses behavioural nudges and the gamification of training.

By John Portch and Sarah Evans
When it comes to performance, the current generation of athletes are, on the whole, better informed and more inquisitive than their predecessors.

But what can a practitioner do when an athlete doesn’t ask ‘why’?

“There’s a few options,” says Ben Rosenblatt, a physical performance coach who has worked with the England men’s football team, GB and England women’s hockey teams and Olympic Judoka amongst others.

“Do you know them well enough to understand why they don’t want to know? If it’s because they just want to get told, they’ve got trust, and they don’t want to know ‘why’, they just want to crack on with it and say ‘go on then, give us the programme’, I’ll commit to it, we’ll give it a crack, and then afterwards we can work out how well that worked.

“Do they not want to know ‘why’ because they’ve disengaged? If so, then you might just see them floating around a session or trying to disrupt others.

“The other one is that they’re just not that interested in physical conditioning and preparation because not everyone is. Most people take up sport or play high level sport not because they love doing press-ups and sit-ups, it’s because they love their sport.

“So you’ve got to try and understand the reason why they’ve disengaged and you’re also trying to find out, as a consequence, how they’re best going to receive information. So you can just ask some really simple questions to ascertain that. If it were you and me working together I’ll ask: ‘what’s the best way that we communicate with each other? What do you need from me? what’s important to you physically? what’s worked in the past?

“You might say: ‘I just need a programme and to crack on’. That’s absolutely fine and that’s what you’re going to get. But then we can also ask the athlete ‘can we review it every six weeks?’ This will give you both the opportunity to learn more about each other.”

This is the second part of our interview with Rosenblatt, who discussed behavioural mapping in the first instalment.

The conversation takes a turn into nudge theory, which is defined by Imperial College London as: ‘based upon the idea that by shaping the environment, also known as the choice architecture, one can influence the likelihood that one option is chosen over another by individuals.’

“This is where you bleed into the gamification of training and environmental nudges to encourage people to engage in stuff they might not necessarily want to,” says Rosenblatt, who in 2021 visited the Behavioural Insights Team (commonly known as the ‘Nudge Unit’), which previously operated under the auspices of the UK Government but is now run independently. It has informed his approach, as have visits to University College London, the University of Bedfordshire, and the Design Museum in London.

Returning to nudge theory, Rosenblatt says: “The basic principle is called EAST, which is making things: easy, accessible, social and timely.

“If you can make anything align with any of those four things, if you can make something really easy to engage in, really accessible, so it’s at the right time and the right place, it’s part of the social environment and it’s timely, it’s at the time when they should be doing it, then you’ll absolutely get the behaviour change.”

He cites an example from his time with the England men’s football team. “One problem was how we get the players to go in the pool immediately after training on a particular day with the physical performance team. Using nudge principles we decided to nick the players trainers and put them in the pool area! This meant, to walk back to the hotel, they had to go to the pool first! We also put recovery shakes in there and scattered some balls and some inflatables in the pool. So when they went to get their trainers, it was easier to take a shake and then jump in the pool with their mates rather than leave! They ended up staying in for half an hour or so.

Gamification can be a useful tool in training environments. “If it’s a group that does want to engage a little bit more, like the hockey girls, then you do things like have a synchronised swimming competition. Again, if you’re saying we’re going to do a pool recovery session, then the players will come in knackered, they’ll go up and down the pool for 10 minutes and get out. If we say we’re having a synchronised swimming competition and you’ve got 15 minutes to come up with a routine, they’re in there for 40 minutes working out what the routine is, hanging around the pool to play afterwards etc. Those are ways you can get players that just aren’t interested or who don’t want to know. Rather than giving them full autonomy, you create an environmental nudge that means that they have to dive in there literally.

“There’s other ways of doing it. One other idea is to play with the schedule. OK, so let’s say you’re trying to introduce a new form of training to the group (like strength work). Rather than make the session an additional training session, make it part of the original training session. So if they’re coming into the gym before going onto the grass, start with a familiar warm up, something they’re comfortable with and then you introduce the new activity as a competition. If it’s aligned to something you want them to get better at and want them to improve at; because it’s a competition everyone’s automatically engaged in it.

“Again, this is more relevant to athletes who aren’t as engaged with their physical preparation. But if you do a familiar warm up and there’s some little competition then they’re automatically going to engage in it.  If it’s aligned to the physical outcome that you want, then they’re going to improve! The best way I’ve found of organising competition for maximum engagement is 1 1v1 competition in a team v team scenario… essentially you stack up points for your team by winning individual competitions against your opponents.

“You can then start to make it fun. We had an ongoing jump squat competition throughout the Euros where the players would compete for boxing belts based on how fast they were moving the bar. Training intensity and enjoyment went through the roof! All the athletes have noticed is that they’ve had a bit of fun and they’ve enjoyed themselves whilst being really physical. But if you start stacking that up over a course of two, three, four or five weeks, you’ve got a really strong physical conditioning response there.”

Ben Rosenblatt is the Founder of 292 Performance.

Want to discuss environmental nudges with Ben?

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @ben_rosenblatt

Members Only

22 Aug 2023

Articles

Effective Talent Development Models: Why Individualisation and Interdisciplinary Are Critical Features

Category
Coaching & Development, Premium
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/creating-effective-talent-development-models-why-individualisation-and-interdisciplinary-are-critical-features/

In the second session of his Performance Support Series on talent development, Edd Vahid of the English Premier League discusses individualisation and interdisciplinary support.

By Luke Whitworth
Our latest Performance Support Series explores the past, present, and future of talent development. This series of learning is being delivered by Dr Edd Vahid, the Head of Academy Football Operations at the English Premier League.

For the second session of the series, Vahid outlined a few aims for those in attendance, as we continue to explore the ‘5 I’s’ model first shared in session one. If you missed out on the first part of this series, you can read about the model and other key points here. The aims were as followed:

  • Introduce individualised and interdisciplinary support as critical features of successful talent development models.
  • Discuss the challenges, tensions and opportunities in individualising support.
  • Explore the conditions that allow interdisciplinary support to thrive.

Being individualised

As part of the first session of this series, attendees were asked to rank themselves around their effectiveness of the ‘5 I’s’ model. On a ranking of 1-5, below were the responses for the two parts of the model we explored in session two:

  • Individualised Support: 4.1
  • Interdisciplinary Support: 3.8

These responses provided some interesting insights into where we think we are in relation to our talent development frameworks and environment. Providing individualised and interdisciplinary support, scored highest out of the five elements of the model, but with clear room for improvement.

To help us think about the importance of being truly individualised, whilst also appreciating the tensions and challenges that come along with this, Vahid brought in some of the work from author Todd Rose and renowned sociologist Pierre Bourdieu to elevate these points.

The End of Average

In Rose’s The End of Average, there was an anecdote highlighting bodies of research by the US Air Force into why there were so many incidents, despite having some of the best pilots in the world and the best technology. One of the key summaries was that the cockpit was built upon the average needs of a pilot rather than the specific needs.

Out of 4,063 pilots, not a single airman could fit in the cockpit, within the average range on all 10 dimensions. One pilot might have a longer-than-average arm length, but a shorter-than-average leg length. Another pilot might have a big chest but small hips. Even more astonishing, (Lt. Gilbert S.) Daniels discovered that if you picked out just three of the ten dimensions of size — say, neck circumference, thigh circumference and wrist circumference — less than 3.5 per cent of pilots would be average sized on all three dimensions. Daniels’s findings were clear and incontrovertible. There was no such thing as an average pilot. If you’ve designed a cockpit to fit the average pilot, you’ve actually designed it to fit no one.

This passage in The End of Average highlights that being truly individualised is crucial in allowing us to optimise the support and impact we can have on individuals. It is also worth noting that individualisation continues to be a challenge with the scales we are operating at, and the resources we have at our disposal.

Habitus, field and capital

To align to the work of Rose, we complemented this with the research of Bourdieu, whose work encourages us think more deeply about ‘the individual’ and, in our context, who we are trying to provide individualised support for.

Bourdieu talked about the concepts of habitus, field and capital.

‘Habitus’ is the ‘product of history, (that) produces individual and collective practices. It ensures the active presence of past experiences, which, deposited in each organism in the form of schemes of perception, thought and action… Bourdieu and Wacquant suggest that when an individual encounters an environment that is compatible with their established habitus, they are like ‘fish in water’. It’s important to recognise that we all have individual habituses; we’re different.

‘Field’ is the social arena, where people compete for resources and demonstrate their power.

‘Capital’ is the notion of competing in a field and enhance social position – individuals require capital. Different forms of capital might exist and potentially include physical and economic. The new environment (field) establishes the cultural, social and symbolic. An individual must adapt if they have aspirations for distinction and subsequent progression. Relevant to us, how are we creating experiences to better prepare our talent for what’s next?

The tensions in being individualised

We know that being individualised is an important element of an effective talent development model. However, we must acknowledge the tensions and challenges that can exist around this. Some of these tensions and challenges can be ironed out, some just exist and are hard to eradicate. Based on some of Vahid’s experiences, he shared a few that he often sees:

The individual and / or the team. Cohesion is an important part of a high-performing team. There could be a tension in an individual who isn’t in the higher grading from an individual performance point of view, but is a strong contributor to team cohesion or getting the best out of others. What do you do?

Performance vs potential: many environments experience the challenge of defining potential – what is it and how are we assessing it? How predictable can we be in that assessment? There are many examples of individuals who were judged to not be at a particular level, but have moved to another environment and thrived.

Club and organisational philosophy. It depends on the organisation and what the philosophy is. Is it about prioritising and getting one or two athletes in the first team environment? Therefore, you would be in your own right to focus on A-grade talent and not so much those that might support the cohesion of the group.

Interdisciplinary support

‘If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail’ – Abraham Maslow

At the heart of these conversations, the value of having multiple eyes and different perspectives that add value. An effective multidisciplinary team, working in an interdisciplinary fashion is reliant on an inclusive environment where everyone can turn up and truly express themselves and feel comfortable in contribution. How do we get an interdisciplinary function to work effectively?

The conditions

Psychological safety is an underpinning concept that supports interdisciplinarity. The work of Professor Timothy Clark at Durham University, a specialist in environmental humanities and deconstruction, suggests that the first step is about inclusion safety and how we as leaders or individuals are contributing to a team to ensure there is suitable inclusion into conversations, allowing everyone to contribute.

Author Patrick Lencioni’s work around the ‘The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team’ suggests that the heart of dysfunction is the absence of trust. Invest time to ensure that the individuals can show up to enable the multidisciplinary team to work in an interdisciplinary fashion.

Judgment criteria. When giving consideration to how disciplines or individuals are judged, these have to be aligned with the organisational vision. Each discipline can have their own detailed judgment criteria and if that is not aligned it can cause separation which undermines the ability to work in an interdisciplinary fashion. To underline this point, it’s also important to have interdisciplinary markers of success.

Role clarity. A consideration for how the various disciplines are inducted for how they contribute to the bigger picture.

How do we physically create the conditions for conversations? How are you working to create flow and connection in an organisation? In Edd’s experience in talent development environments, there’s been a strong push to get multidisciplinary teams sitting closer together to enhance interdisciplinarity but do we need to be doing more than just where people sit and creating more conditions within the environments to support this way of operating?

17 Aug 2023

Podcasts

Keiser Podcast – Damien Comolli and Toulouse FC

Category
Leadership & Culture
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/podcasts/keiser-podcast-damien-comolli-and-toulouse-fc/

The club’s President joins the Leaders Performance Podcast alongside Selinay Gürgenç Comolli and Julien Demeaux.

A podcast brought to you by our Main Partners

The rise of Toulouse FC has been both fast and meticulously planned.

Le Téfécé were Ligue 2 champions in 2022 and, last season, won the Coupe de France – their first major trophy in 66 years.

Toulouse also finished 13th in their first season back in Ligue 1 – well clear of the relegation zone. Not that Damien Comolli, the club’s President since 2020, is resting on this laurels.

“Everyone said ‘well done on staying up’ but we’re not interested in staying up – we never mentioned staying up – we said we want to finish as high as possible,” he tells the Leaders Performance Podcast.

“There are games that we feel we should have won and could have won. We lacked this cutting edge, this winning mentality at times, we should have got more points, we should have finished higher than 13th in the table.”

Damien Comolli has overseen the Toulouse’s resurgence under new owners RedBird Capital Partners, but he couldn’t have done it without his ‘truth teller’, the club’s Head of Strategy & Culture, Selinay Gürgenç Comolli, and Julien Demeaux, Toulouse’s Head of Data.

Both Selinay and Julien joined Damien for this episode, which is brought to you by our Main Partners Keiser.

The theme is Toulouse’s upwards trajectory and what it is going to take to help establish the club at the vanguard of European football.

On today’s agenda:

  • How Damien is working to prevent Toulouse being a ‘one-season-wonder’ [9:00];
  • His view on the importance of having a ‘truth teller’ in Selinay [12:30];
  • Selinay on the importance of the club’s strategic committee [22:00];
  • Julien on the comparative immaturity of data usage in football [32:00].

Henry Breckenridge Twitter | LinkedIn

John Portch Twitter | LinkedIn

Listen above and subscribe today on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher and Overcast, or your chosen podcast platform.

14 Aug 2023

Articles

‘Keeping People Healthy Is the Focus of Athlete Recovery – But There Is an Art to Doing that Consistently’

Category
Human Performance
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/keeping-people-healthy-is-the-focus-of-athlete-recovery-but-there-is-an-art-to-doing-that-consistently/

Here are 10 factors that can increase the effectiveness of your recovery practices.

An article brought to you by our Partners

sport techie

By John Portch
What makes the difference in recovery, both in practices and modalities, with your athletes?

Those two are inseparable as far as Skylar Richards is concerned. He says: “As technology has improved, to allow us to have interventions to help the best they can off the field, that has really given us the ability to look into what’s effective, what’s efficient, and how we can individualise those sorts of treatments to make sure we’re as optimal as possible.”

In Early August, Richards who is an Athletic Trainer with the US Soccer Federation, spoke at a KYMIRA Webinar titled ‘The Evolution of Athlete Recovery’ where he was joined by Mark Pavlik, the Head Coach of the Penn State men’s volleyball team, and session moderator Johnny Parkes, the Lead National Coach at the United States Tennis Association.

“So much in sports science and medicine, we worry not so much about the medicine side of things as much as the optimisation,” Richards continues. “And so really keeping people as healthy as possible is the focus with recovery but also then the art of how to do that consistently within their regime.”

Here, we discuss 10 factors raised during the webinar to consider when seeking to establish optimal, consistent recovery practices with your athletes.

  1. How do you combine passive and active modalities?

Do you need to prioritise passive or active modalities? Your athletes’ culture of recovery – practices and habits – should tell you. In his time at FC Dallas between 2012 and 2019, Richards noted differences between his younger players, who were happy to visit the recovery lab while they watched tape, and those players in their mid-30s who had families and, frankly, far less time and cognitive capacity. “Those become the tricky puzzles to figure out,” he says. “How can I help them recover in their lives and support them in that? That can be the difference between applying an active modality versus a passive one, a wearable or something like that. It helps them to do it all the time no matter what life throws at them.”

  1. What gives the athlete the biggest dosage?

Whatever an athlete’s preferred combination of recovery modalities, there is an important question to ask. “What gives you the biggest dosage of all those things put together in one package, which is easy to manage and to be consistent?” says Richards. “You don’t want them to burn out having to think about stuff all the time.”

  1. How are you helping busy athletes to prioritise recovery?

A veteran may have a busy life but, as a cohort of largely self-driven individuals, Richards can work with soccer players to “scratch that itch” around self-improvement. “Something that I’ve found I can do well with my older athletes: I’ll say ‘why don’t we try to instal a recovery room at your house? It gives you an hour away from the kids and the craziness to go in, watch some videos, and now read a book. Whatever you need to do justify it as your job’.” Now, the athlete has a consistent pattern of recovery and doesn’t feel the need to, say, go on an evening run that may well clear their minds but has a detrimental effect on their physiology. “We scratch the same itch by helping you rather than sacrificing something.”

  1. Does the athlete know what works for them?

The success of Richards’ approach with his veterans has enabled them to take that message to the rest of the team. “Getting them to talk about that approach to the younger players really helps them to buy-in,” he says. With men’s volleyball at Penn State, it sits with Pavlik and his colleagues to educate the archetypal 18-year-old who “doesn’t know what they don’t know yet from a recovery standpoint”. He says: “They’re coming off of club or high school practices at most three times a week, they’re living at home with mum and dad when they wander into our gym, it’s my job to ensure that the educational points that we’re trying to drive home so they can have a longstanding, successful collegiate career, and those that continue to move on through the professional ranks and international ranks with men’s volleyball have something in their background.”

  1. Expert or friend?

That aforementioned education is best delivered by a friend. In that regard, Pavlik ensures that his student-athletes are surrounded by smart and passionate people who make an effort to build relationships. “We do a pretty good job of getting these people around my team early in their career and, let’s face it, the adage of ‘the team doesn’t care what you know until they know that you care’ [is true],” he says. “When you have these types of experts having relationships with our players; coming to practice, just being around the water cooler during water breaks, being able to just say ‘how’s it going?’ Then when the guys are in a position to listen to what the expert is saying they’re no longer experts – they’re friends, they’re buddies.”

  1. Game day minus one

Are there opportunities for you around game day? “It’s always been crazy to me that we control every other variable with athletes all the time, but the one day we completely flip the schedule is game day,” says Richards. “Those older guys love those moments of recovery on the road. For them, it’s less chaotic, it’s easier to focus. So much so that we’ve had a lot of success with having players to stay at a hotel the night before a home game or have that option, so that they can get into that rhythm and we change those practice times to the same as game times so they can get that day before the game rhythm into their bodies and their minds.” The benefits are palpable. “Allowing them to get into that rhythm early on, sleep, get out of that chaos, get their recovery mode early and have time to do any modalities that they want is crucial.”

  1. What’s the problem we can solve the best?

Customisation is important and, at Penn State, it goes beyond age (i.e. an athlete at 18 versus an athlete at 23). “We look at the age and the experience of the athlete, then we take a look at what their on-court responsibilities are,” says Pavlik. “Some max jump much more often than others on the court during the match or practices. There are going to be some that have to get up the floor a lot more than other guys. What we try to do here is make sure with our training staff and med staff that we understand what we’re asking them to go through.” For Richards, it involves asking better questions. “What is the question for that athlete that we can solve the best? All physiology is too much of a blanket statement,” he says. “Is it overall energy? Is it mental fatigue? Is it truly physical fatigue? Is it something masking as another [marker]? And how can we hit those?”

  1. Sleep as a by-product of good recovery practice

As moderator Johnny Parkes says, “With all these physical modalities we can use, I think we sometimes forget about the things we can control the most, which is our level of sleep recovery, hygiene and the effect of resetting the body for the next day.” For Richards, good sleep can be an outcome of a holistic approach to recovery. “That’s when you get the most synergistic effect out of all of them,” he says while asking, “Can we create that cycle of measurements to enhance individualisation and effectiveness?” He once again cites the idea of players staying in hotels the night before a game. “It really ties this together in a practical way in terms of ‘let’s get you good sleep in an environment I can go in early and control, make sure the sleep hygiene is there, giving you the time to implement those things well and then tie-in any other recovery modalities you want at the same time’.”

  1. Gamification as a motivator

According to Richards, both younger and older athletes are interested in the gamification of recovery, but in different ways. “Younger players thrive for the most part on comparing what they’re doing and being effective versus their peers,” he says. “For an older athlete, I’ve found they’ve passed that point in their life, they’ve been saturated by that already and what you come to is the gamification comes from comparing them to themselves. Can they get a high score? Can they see what’s most effective for them? What patterns help them to be the most consistent over time? Scoring that on a streak becomes the better motivator for them.”

  1. The blind spots in athlete recovery

What don’t teams consider as much as they should in recovery and how do we overcome them? “Anything is better than nothing,” says Richards. “We have a huge market for recovery tools and methodologies but I haven’t seen a huge move towards a blend of that. That’s where I’ve been pushing a lot of companies on their research. Can we let the monitoring devices drive the intervention; the duration, the velocity, the frequency and occurrence? Can we use measuring sticks to drive it for individuals; its appropriateness, effectiveness and sufficiency on an individual level? Until we do that I don’t think we’re doing the best we can do to figure out the puzzle, which is an athletic body.”

8 Aug 2023

Articles

Do your Team’s Behaviours Truly Match their Performance Ambitions?

Category
Coaching & Development, Human Performance, Leadership & Culture
Share
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
https://leadersinsport.com/performance-institute/articles/do-your-teams-behaviours-truly-match-their-performance-ambitions/

In the first instalment of our two-part interview, physical performance coach Ben Rosenblatt considers the benefits of behaviour mapping a programme.

By John Portch and Sarah Evans
What causes athletes to develop self-defeating behaviours in a high performance environment?

“My starting point is that no one is trying to do it,” says physical performance coach Ben Rosenblatt.

“As a high performance athlete, everyone’s got the intent to go and win. No one turns up to training every day thinking ‘I’m going to be difficult today’. You can turn up and say ‘I don’t really fancy it’ because that’s what humans do, but no one has the intention to be bad.”

Rosenblatt was the Lead Men’s Physical Performance Coach at the Football Association between 2016 and 2023 and was part of Gareth Southgate’s staff at two Fifa World Cups and one Uefa European Championships. He has worked across a series of sports and has worked at both the English Institute of Sport (now UK Sports Institute) and the British Olympic Association.

In the first part of our interview, Rosenblatt makes the case for a framework that enables a practitioner to bridge performance gaps.

‘Things didn’t match up’

Rosenblatt explains that his approach when entering a programme has evolved, although his principles remain unchanged. He says: “It is a case of identifying what the team’s ambitions are, seeing how resonant they are with what they’re trying to achieve, and then identifying the behaviours that should be in place to deliver that.”

He recalls an example from an Olympic sport where those two were misaligned. “One team wanted to be the best in the world and the most physically dominant,” Rosenblatt continues. “For me, those things didn’t match up, particularly when I spoke to the athletes and coaches and heard a different narrative.

“When I dug into it with the athletes and coaches and asked ‘what are the hallmarks and successful traits of teams you think are going to enable you to win and how are we going to do it?’ Then I quickly realised that their ambitions around being physically fittest and the most dominant were probably not the thing that was going to help us win in the Olympics.”

A gold medal-winning performance did not require a well-executed 30-15 intermittent fitness test or bleep test. “There were problems with basic things like stability and robustness and just being able to train frequently enough. We can go and chase all the sexy stuff, which physical conditioning coaches really want to do like speed and agility, strength and power, but what we really need to do is keep the players playing consistently and increasing volume and intensity for their sport-specific training because that’s what will make them a better team.”

‘How does that individual learn?’

Why might a team fall into a poor behavioural pattern in the first place?

“It typically comes from a gap in capabilities, knowledge, skills and experience,” says Rosenblatt. “It can also be their opportunity, so the social environment they’re in; and then their motivation.”

He explains that a coach’s understanding of athlete motivation may be flawed. “A coach might say ‘they just don’t want it enough’ or ‘they just don’t know enough’ then you can end up in a fight with an athlete who says ‘what are you talking about? I’m doing everything I can’ or you can try to bamboozle them with knowledge that they don’t really know how to receive,” he continues.

“An example might be: ‘I’m going to give you some detailed information about why strength training is important’ and they’re like ‘I don’t really care’ or ‘I don’t have the framework to understand what you’re telling me’. You’ve got to identify where those gaps in behaviours and opportunities are. So if it is around knowledge, skills and experience, then you’ve got to ask the question ‘how do they learn? How does that individual learn? How do they best receive and retain information?’

“That might be different as a head coach compared to a young athlete or even a seasoned athlete. They’re going to learn and experience physical training differently. They’re also different generations; they’re going to have different social values placed on them as well. Understanding the individual and how they learn and receive knowledge is really important.”

‘Not everyone had seen Rocky’

Rosenblatt’s understanding came from a growing appreciation of motivation science, which he had previously overlooked.

The penny dropped prior to the 2016 Rio Olympics, when he worked concurrently with GB judokas and women’s field hockey players. Whilst the Judokas wanted to receive a training programme and be told what to do, this approach didn’t work with the women’s hockey team.

“I tried to understand the motivational science behind it,” he says. “I assumed my generation, my background, I was brought up in a boxing gym and I assumed everyone had watched Rocky and that’s what kind of motivation meant to everyone else. But actually, it’s about the athlete needing to have autonomy and feel like they’re making a decision; is there a connection between the work they’re currently doing and what they’re aspiring to achieve and do they feel like they’re getting better?

“So if you really want to make sure an athlete is motivated to commit to the programme and commit to certain behaviours that are different to the ones they’re currently engaging in, is there a connection between what they’re trying to do and what they’re trying to achieve? The tangible – can they see it? Have they had a choice in the path that they’re taking?

“They might not have the skills and experience to write the programme or to take all the direction, but there still has to be a choice somewhere along the line. ‘Do you want to train at 3 or 3:30?’ If there’s some level of choice it makes people feel more connected to it.

“The other one is progression. Do they actually feel they’re getting better and it’s achieving the things they’re really interested in? I think that was the biggest mistake I made with the hockey group when I came in.

“That comes back to helping the players connect and recognise what’s important to the things they’re trying to achieve. I think that’s always a tricky one when people start introducing strength training, in particular, into team sports or any kind of training for athletes.

“I’ve certainly had that experience in football. There’s a big disconnect between lifting weights and performance. Particularly when the first thing you experience when you lift weights for the first time is that you get sore and you can’t move for two or three days. There’s a real disconnect with that. So I think you’ve got to recognise the experience that the athlete is actually living. That’s really important. Also, work out the different solutions and strategies that are available for that player at that particular time.”

Ben Rosenblatt is the Founder of 292 Performance.

Want to discuss performance behaviours with Ben?

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @ben_rosenblatt

Go to home
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on X

Contact

Leaders UK

Tuition House
27-37 St George's Road
Wimbledon
SW19 4EU
London
United Kingdom

Enquiries Line: +44 (0)207 806 9817
Switchboard Number: +44 (0)207 042 8666

Leaders US

120 W Morehead St # 400
Charlotte
NC 28202
United States

Enquiries Line: +1 646 350 0449

Leaders

  • Contact
  • About
  • Careers
  • News
  • Privacy Policy
  • CA Privacy Rights
  • Cookie Notice
  • Website Terms of Use

Performance Institute

  • Membership
  • Events
  • Content
  • Virtual Learning
  • Connections
  • Partners

Latest

Intelligence Hub
High Performance Future Trends Research Elite Performance Partners continue to drive the potential in high performance forward through renewed Leaders partnership
Your Privacy Choices

© 2026 Leaders. All rights reserved

  • Privacy Policy

Attendees

x